Perlite is an amorphous glass deposit near volcanoes. Perlite normally exists in the form of lightweight, highly porous particles with a frothy-like microstructure. It is the micro, inter-connected air bubbles (or pores) inside perlite particles which create an excellent heat resistance (it can withstand a rising temperature even above 1,000°C). These micro bubbles simultaneously result in the capacity to absorb water and expand to multiple times the original volume (from 5 to 20 times) and obviously, weaken. (The more water perlite absorbs, the less heat resistant it becomes.)
In concrete, perlite is normally used as a partial replacement of fine aggregate to improve fire, heat, and acoustic insulation. Perlite concrete therefore finds itself particularly useful for roof insulation as well as other non-structural applications. However, perlite concrete performs very poorly when it comes to load-bearing capacity. As perlite absorbs a huge amount of water, expands, and weakens, it critically impacts the strength and durability of the final concrete structures [1]. As an illustration, if the expanded perlite is used as a replacement for fine aggregate (i.e., sand), only 4% replacement by weight of sand can cause a drop of compressive strength of as much as 40%. At 20% replacement by weight, concrete can lose up to 80% of its compressive strength (compared to concrete of the same mix design and the same ingredients, without perlite) [2].
To enhance structural performance of perlite concrete, current research suggests the following:
For the fireproof house you intend to build in South Australia, it is important to discuss with your design consultant and work out the most appropriate strategy to apply perlite concrete.
If it is desirable to use perlite concrete for the entire house, including load-bearing elements, then it is necessary to consult a professional concrete supplier in your area. They may be able to provide you with a customized, especially careful mix design which best suit your need.
Reference(s):
[1] I. B. Topçu and B. Işikdaǧ, “Effect of expanded perlite aggregate on the properties of lightweight concrete,” J Mater Process Technol, vol. 204, no. 1-3, pp. 34-38, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.052.
[2] O. Sengul, S. Azizi, F. Karaosmanoglu, and M. A. Tasdemir, “Effect of expanded perlite on the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of lightweight concrete,” Energy Build, vol. 43, no. 2-3, pp. 671-676, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.11.008.
[3] A. el Mir, S. G. Nehme, and J. J. Assaad, “Durability of self-consolidating concrete containing natural waste perlite powders,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03165.
In terms of sustainable living, building a house near big trees can bring benefits at multiple fronts:
However, there are certain risks associated with building houses near big trees. For example:
Instead of cutting down a healthy big gum tree to clear the land, there are ways to mitigate the risks above. We suggest you discuss with your design engineers to include the following considerations in the house design:
There are certain risks associated with what you intend to do.
However, it is not impossible to proceed with your construction idea. If the slab is de-bonded to the footing, properly jointed and reinforced, and the footing is checked to ensure it is safe under the additional weight of the slab, then it can work just as well as other structures in your house.
It is unclear how you defined concrete sustainability in your question. From our very basic understanding, concrete of the lowest embodied carbon is the most environmentally friendly and therefore, the most sustainable.
Most of the embodied carbon in concrete comes from cement. In normal-class concretes, cement only takes up about 13-16% by total weight, but its embodied carbon contributes to above 90% the total level. This percentage is even higher in special-class including high strength concretes (above 95%).
To reduce the embodied carbon, a number of industrial by-products, also known as supplementary cementitious materials (SCM's), are being used to partly or fully replace cement. Fly ash, for example, can replace up to 35% cement in concrete while also enhancing concrete durability. Similarly, ground granulated blast furnace slag can be used to replace up to 60% cement in concrete.
Most commercial concrete at supermarkets (i.e., dry bagged concrete) contains a moderate amount of SCM's, which is good (even though Australian suppliers rarely disclose the actual amount). In addition, when it comes to cement type, blended cement or limestone cement (i.e., Type GB or GL complying with Australian standard AS 3972) contains more environmental values than the others.
You can contact your local concrete suppliers to clarify the amount of SCM's and cement type used in their products. You can also discuss a “tailored” concrete mix with them to suit better your sustainability goal (which probably will cost you a bit more).
I am proposing to extend the ground floor of my two-storey home to make an extra bedroom. I will use half of the garden at the back of my home to build the room. My house was built in 1982 with concrete floors, double-brick walls and cement-tile roof.
Are you able to guide me to a more suitable material for the new room? Is timber more sustainable than concrete or brick?
The other advice I seek is what is the current best practice with regard to building an additional bedroom?
Firstly, your brick-concrete house has stood strong for over 40 years of normal service. This is a great indication of sustainability when it comes to strength, durability and weatherproof. Congratulations!
Secondly, if you consider sustainability in terms of embodied carbon, then timber has some distinct advantages.
Plus, recycling rate of timber at the end of its service life is high.
Plus, timber is a lightweight material, which is highly beneficial for your new room:
However, there is no perfectly sustainable construction material. Keep in mind the following factors during your decision-making process:
It may be more beneficial for you to consider a good combination of different construction materials, rather than prioritising any of them. Regarding the second part of your question, advice on “best practice” is only appropriate after key design parameters for the room have been chosen, such as material, size, shape, location etc. We suggest you get back to us when more details are available.
Reference(s):
[1] F. de A. Ximenes, B. H. George, A. Cowie, J. Williams, and G. Kelly, “Greenhouse gas balance of native forests in New South Wales, Australia,” Forests, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 653-683, 2012, doi: 10.3390/f3030653.
[2] M. Köhl, P. R. Neupane, and N. Lotfiomran, “The impact of tree age on biomass growth and carbon accumulation capacity: A retrospective analysis using tree ring data of three tropical tree species grown in natural forests of Suriname,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 8, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181187.
[3] J. M. Furlaud, L. D. Prior, G. J. Williamson, and D. M. J. S. Bowman, “Fire risk and severity decline with stand development in Tasmanian giant Eucalyptus forest,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 502, p. 119724, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.FORECO.2021.119724.
Cover should be sufficient to protect the steel mesh or bars inside against wearing and, more importantly, environmental attacks such as chloride corrosion. Corrosion not only causes a gradual reduction of load-bearing capacity but also severely impacts concrete durability. Established knowledge indicates that reducing cover by half can quadruple corrosion rate [1]. On the other hand, increasing cover from 20 mm to 30 mm can double maintenance-free concrete life in service [2].
For your driveway slab, 20 mm cover above SL 92 mesh does not seem enough. (Note that the cover is measured from the finished concrete surface of the element to the nearest surface of the main steel mesh/bars, refer to the illustration above). According to Australian standard AS 3727.1:2016 “Pavement Residential”, the top cover should be at least 30 mm.
Reference(s):
[1] “Durable concrete structures CEB design guide second edition,” 1989.
[2] “CIA Z7/04-2014 Good Practice Through Design, Concrete Supply and Construction,” 2014.
Cracking in concrete slabs may look normal but there are ways to minimize the risk. In your case, cracking started from the vicinity of the tree and propagated further into the slab. It is likely that:
If the slab you built was reinforced with steel mesh, then the steel can hold all the pieces together to keep the cracks as narrow as they can be, and you will be able to use it for a long time to come.
In order to minimize the cracking risk, we suggest you consider the following steps next time you build your slabs:
Perlite is an amorphous glass deposit near volcanoes. Perlite normally exists in the form of lightweight, highly porous particles with a frothy-like microstructure. It is the micro, inter-connected air bubbles (or pores) inside perlite particles which create an excellent heat resistance (it can withstand a rising temperature even above 1,000°C). These micro bubbles simultaneously result in the capacity to absorb water and expand to multiple times the original volume (from 5 to 20 times) and obviously, weaken. (The more water perlite absorbs, the less heat resistant it becomes.)
In concrete, perlite is normally used as a partial replacement of fine aggregate to improve fire, heat, and acoustic insulation. Perlite concrete therefore finds itself particularly useful for roof insulation as well as other non-structural applications. However, perlite concrete performs very poorly when it comes to load-bearing capacity. As perlite absorbs a huge amount of water, expands, and weakens, it critically impacts the strength and durability of the final concrete structures [1]. As an illustration, if the expanded perlite is used as a replacement for fine aggregate (i.e., sand), only 4% replacement by weight of sand can cause a drop of compressive strength of as much as 40%. At 20% replacement by weight, concrete can lose up to 80% of its compressive strength (compared to concrete of the same mix design and the same ingredients, without perlite) [2].
To enhance structural performance of perlite concrete, current research suggests the following:
For the fireproof house you intend to build in South Australia, it is important to discuss with your design consultant and work out the most appropriate strategy to apply perlite concrete.
If it is desirable to use perlite concrete for the entire house, including load-bearing elements, then it is necessary to consult a professional concrete supplier in your area. They may be able to provide you with a customized, especially careful mix design which best suit your need.
Reference(s):
[1] I. B. Topçu and B. Işikdaǧ, “Effect of expanded perlite aggregate on the properties of lightweight concrete,” J Mater Process Technol, vol. 204, no. 1-3, pp. 34-38, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.052.
[2] O. Sengul, S. Azizi, F. Karaosmanoglu, and M. A. Tasdemir, “Effect of expanded perlite on the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of lightweight concrete,” Energy Build, vol. 43, no. 2-3, pp. 671-676, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.11.008.
[3] A. el Mir, S. G. Nehme, and J. J. Assaad, “Durability of self-consolidating concrete containing natural waste perlite powders,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03165.
In terms of sustainable living, building a house near big trees can bring benefits at multiple fronts:
However, there are certain risks associated with building houses near big trees. For example:
Instead of cutting down a healthy big gum tree to clear the land, there are ways to mitigate the risks above. We suggest you discuss with your design engineers to include the following considerations in the house design:
There are certain risks associated with what you intend to do.
However, it is not impossible to proceed with your construction idea. If the slab is de-bonded to the footing, properly jointed and reinforced, and the footing is checked to ensure it is safe under the additional weight of the slab, then it can work just as well as other structures in your house.
It is unclear how you defined concrete sustainability in your question. From our very basic understanding, concrete of the lowest embodied carbon is the most environmentally friendly and therefore, the most sustainable.
Most of the embodied carbon in concrete comes from cement. In normal-class concretes, cement only takes up about 13-16% by total weight, but its embodied carbon contributes to above 90% the total level. This percentage is even higher in special-class including high strength concretes (above 95%).
To reduce the embodied carbon, a number of industrial by-products, also known as supplementary cementitious materials (SCM's), are being used to partly or fully replace cement. Fly ash, for example, can replace up to 35% cement in concrete while also enhancing concrete durability. Similarly, ground granulated blast furnace slag can be used to replace up to 60% cement in concrete.
Most commercial concrete at supermarkets (i.e., dry bagged concrete) contains a moderate amount of SCM's, which is good (even though Australian suppliers rarely disclose the actual amount). In addition, when it comes to cement type, blended cement or limestone cement (i.e., Type GB or GL complying with Australian standard AS 3972) contains more environmental values than the others.
You can contact your local concrete suppliers to clarify the amount of SCM's and cement type used in their products. You can also discuss a “tailored” concrete mix with them to suit better your sustainability goal (which probably will cost you a bit more).
I am proposing to extend the ground floor of my two-storey home to make an extra bedroom. I will use half of the garden at the back of my home to build the room. My house was built in 1982 with concrete floors, double-brick walls and cement-tile roof.
Are you able to guide me to a more suitable material for the new room? Is timber more sustainable than concrete or brick?
The other advice I seek is what is the current best practice with regard to building an additional bedroom?
Firstly, your brick-concrete house has stood strong for over 40 years of normal service. This is a great indication of sustainability when it comes to strength, durability and weatherproof. Congratulations!
Secondly, if you consider sustainability in terms of embodied carbon, then timber has some distinct advantages.
Plus, recycling rate of timber at the end of its service life is high.
Plus, timber is a lightweight material, which is highly beneficial for your new room:
However, there is no perfectly sustainable construction material. Keep in mind the following factors during your decision-making process:
It may be more beneficial for you to consider a good combination of different construction materials, rather than prioritising any of them. Regarding the second part of your question, advice on “best practice” is only appropriate after key design parameters for the room have been chosen, such as material, size, shape, location etc. We suggest you get back to us when more details are available.
Reference(s):
[1] F. de A. Ximenes, B. H. George, A. Cowie, J. Williams, and G. Kelly, “Greenhouse gas balance of native forests in New South Wales, Australia,” Forests, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 653-683, 2012, doi: 10.3390/f3030653.
[2] M. Köhl, P. R. Neupane, and N. Lotfiomran, “The impact of tree age on biomass growth and carbon accumulation capacity: A retrospective analysis using tree ring data of three tropical tree species grown in natural forests of Suriname,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 8, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181187.
[3] J. M. Furlaud, L. D. Prior, G. J. Williamson, and D. M. J. S. Bowman, “Fire risk and severity decline with stand development in Tasmanian giant Eucalyptus forest,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 502, p. 119724, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.FORECO.2021.119724.
Cover should be sufficient to protect the steel mesh or bars inside against wearing and, more importantly, environmental attacks such as chloride corrosion. Corrosion not only causes a gradual reduction of load-bearing capacity but also severely impacts concrete durability. Established knowledge indicates that reducing cover by half can quadruple corrosion rate [1]. On the other hand, increasing cover from 20 mm to 30 mm can double maintenance-free concrete life in service [2].
For your driveway slab, 20 mm cover above SL 92 mesh does not seem enough. (Note that the cover is measured from the finished concrete surface of the element to the nearest surface of the main steel mesh/bars, refer to the illustration above). According to Australian standard AS 3727.1:2016 “Pavement Residential”, the top cover should be at least 30 mm.
Reference(s):
[1] “Durable concrete structures CEB design guide second edition,” 1989.
[2] “CIA Z7/04-2014 Good Practice Through Design, Concrete Supply and Construction,” 2014.
Cracking in concrete slabs may look normal but there are ways to minimize the risk. In your case, cracking started from the vicinity of the tree and propagated further into the slab. It is likely that:
If the slab you built was reinforced with steel mesh, then the steel can hold all the pieces together to keep the cracks as narrow as they can be, and you will be able to use it for a long time to come.
In order to minimize the cracking risk, we suggest you consider the following steps next time you build your slabs:
Perlite is an amorphous glass deposit near volcanoes. Perlite normally exists in the form of lightweight, highly porous particles with a frothy-like microstructure. It is the micro, inter-connected air bubbles (or pores) inside perlite particles which create an excellent heat resistance (it can withstand a rising temperature even above 1,000°C). These micro bubbles simultaneously result in the capacity to absorb water and expand to multiple times the original volume (from 5 to 20 times) and obviously, weaken. (The more water perlite absorbs, the less heat resistant it becomes.)
In concrete, perlite is normally used as a partial replacement of fine aggregate to improve fire, heat, and acoustic insulation. Perlite concrete therefore finds itself particularly useful for roof insulation as well as other non-structural applications. However, perlite concrete performs very poorly when it comes to load-bearing capacity. As perlite absorbs a huge amount of water, expands, and weakens, it critically impacts the strength and durability of the final concrete structures [1]. As an illustration, if the expanded perlite is used as a replacement for fine aggregate (i.e., sand), only 4% replacement by weight of sand can cause a drop of compressive strength of as much as 40%. At 20% replacement by weight, concrete can lose up to 80% of its compressive strength (compared to concrete of the same mix design and the same ingredients, without perlite) [2].
To enhance structural performance of perlite concrete, current research suggests the following:
For the fireproof house you intend to build in South Australia, it is important to discuss with your design consultant and work out the most appropriate strategy to apply perlite concrete.
If it is desirable to use perlite concrete for the entire house, including load-bearing elements, then it is necessary to consult a professional concrete supplier in your area. They may be able to provide you with a customized, especially careful mix design which best suit your need.
Reference(s):
[1] I. B. Topçu and B. Işikdaǧ, “Effect of expanded perlite aggregate on the properties of lightweight concrete,” J Mater Process Technol, vol. 204, no. 1-3, pp. 34-38, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.052.
[2] O. Sengul, S. Azizi, F. Karaosmanoglu, and M. A. Tasdemir, “Effect of expanded perlite on the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of lightweight concrete,” Energy Build, vol. 43, no. 2-3, pp. 671-676, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.11.008.
[3] A. el Mir, S. G. Nehme, and J. J. Assaad, “Durability of self-consolidating concrete containing natural waste perlite powders,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03165.
In terms of sustainable living, building a house near big trees can bring benefits at multiple fronts:
However, there are certain risks associated with building houses near big trees. For example:
Instead of cutting down a healthy big gum tree to clear the land, there are ways to mitigate the risks above. We suggest you discuss with your design engineers to include the following considerations in the house design:
There are certain risks associated with what you intend to do.
However, it is not impossible to proceed with your construction idea. If the slab is de-bonded to the footing, properly jointed and reinforced, and the footing is checked to ensure it is safe under the additional weight of the slab, then it can work just as well as other structures in your house.
It is unclear how you defined concrete sustainability in your question. From our very basic understanding, concrete of the lowest embodied carbon is the most environmentally friendly and therefore, the most sustainable.
Most of the embodied carbon in concrete comes from cement. In normal-class concretes, cement only takes up about 13-16% by total weight, but its embodied carbon contributes to above 90% the total level. This percentage is even higher in special-class including high strength concretes (above 95%).
To reduce the embodied carbon, a number of industrial by-products, also known as supplementary cementitious materials (SCM's), are being used to partly or fully replace cement. Fly ash, for example, can replace up to 35% cement in concrete while also enhancing concrete durability. Similarly, ground granulated blast furnace slag can be used to replace up to 60% cement in concrete.
Most commercial concrete at supermarkets (i.e., dry bagged concrete) contains a moderate amount of SCM's, which is good (even though Australian suppliers rarely disclose the actual amount). In addition, when it comes to cement type, blended cement or limestone cement (i.e., Type GB or GL complying with Australian standard AS 3972) contains more environmental values than the others.
You can contact your local concrete suppliers to clarify the amount of SCM's and cement type used in their products. You can also discuss a “tailored” concrete mix with them to suit better your sustainability goal (which probably will cost you a bit more).
I am proposing to extend the ground floor of my two-storey home to make an extra bedroom. I will use half of the garden at the back of my home to build the room. My house was built in 1982 with concrete floors, double-brick walls and cement-tile roof.
Are you able to guide me to a more suitable material for the new room? Is timber more sustainable than concrete or brick?
The other advice I seek is what is the current best practice with regard to building an additional bedroom?
Firstly, your brick-concrete house has stood strong for over 40 years of normal service. This is a great indication of sustainability when it comes to strength, durability and weatherproof. Congratulations!
Secondly, if you consider sustainability in terms of embodied carbon, then timber has some distinct advantages.
Plus, recycling rate of timber at the end of its service life is high.
Plus, timber is a lightweight material, which is highly beneficial for your new room:
However, there is no perfectly sustainable construction material. Keep in mind the following factors during your decision-making process:
It may be more beneficial for you to consider a good combination of different construction materials, rather than prioritising any of them. Regarding the second part of your question, advice on “best practice” is only appropriate after key design parameters for the room have been chosen, such as material, size, shape, location etc. We suggest you get back to us when more details are available.
Reference(s):
[1] F. de A. Ximenes, B. H. George, A. Cowie, J. Williams, and G. Kelly, “Greenhouse gas balance of native forests in New South Wales, Australia,” Forests, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 653-683, 2012, doi: 10.3390/f3030653.
[2] M. Köhl, P. R. Neupane, and N. Lotfiomran, “The impact of tree age on biomass growth and carbon accumulation capacity: A retrospective analysis using tree ring data of three tropical tree species grown in natural forests of Suriname,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 8, Aug. 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181187.
[3] J. M. Furlaud, L. D. Prior, G. J. Williamson, and D. M. J. S. Bowman, “Fire risk and severity decline with stand development in Tasmanian giant Eucalyptus forest,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 502, p. 119724, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.FORECO.2021.119724.
Cover should be sufficient to protect the steel mesh or bars inside against wearing and, more importantly, environmental attacks such as chloride corrosion. Corrosion not only causes a gradual reduction of load-bearing capacity but also severely impacts concrete durability. Established knowledge indicates that reducing cover by half can quadruple corrosion rate [1]. On the other hand, increasing cover from 20 mm to 30 mm can double maintenance-free concrete life in service [2].
For your driveway slab, 20 mm cover above SL 92 mesh does not seem enough. (Note that the cover is measured from the finished concrete surface of the element to the nearest surface of the main steel mesh/bars, refer to the illustration above). According to Australian standard AS 3727.1:2016 “Pavement Residential”, the top cover should be at least 30 mm.
Reference(s):
[1] “Durable concrete structures CEB design guide second edition,” 1989.
[2] “CIA Z7/04-2014 Good Practice Through Design, Concrete Supply and Construction,” 2014.
Cracking in concrete slabs may look normal but there are ways to minimize the risk. In your case, cracking started from the vicinity of the tree and propagated further into the slab. It is likely that:
If the slab you built was reinforced with steel mesh, then the steel can hold all the pieces together to keep the cracks as narrow as they can be, and you will be able to use it for a long time to come.
In order to minimize the cracking risk, we suggest you consider the following steps next time you build your slabs: